<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Privacy For Employee Info On Office Computers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.discoveryresources.org/library/case-law-and-rules/no-privacy-for-employee-info-on-office-computers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.discoveryresources.org/library/case-law-and-rules/no-privacy-for-employee-info-on-office-computers/</link>
	<description>Electronic Discovery (E-Discovery) Resources, News &#38; Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 20:04:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fmp</title>
		<link>http://www.discoveryresources.org/library/case-law-and-rules/no-privacy-for-employee-info-on-office-computers/#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator>fmp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.discoveryresources.org/?p=471#comment-605</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your comment, Susan H.  The title was based, in part, on the specific language used by the court in its holding, the analysis for which involved a discussion of the legal concept of &quot;expectation of privacy.&quot; 

By: Co-author</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your comment, Susan H.  The title was based, in part, on the specific language used by the court in its holding, the analysis for which involved a discussion of the legal concept of &#8220;expectation of privacy.&#8221; </p>
<p>By: Co-author</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan H.</title>
		<link>http://www.discoveryresources.org/library/case-law-and-rules/no-privacy-for-employee-info-on-office-computers/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 21:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.discoveryresources.org/?p=471#comment-328</guid>
		<description>The title for this article is misleading.  This does not concern Personal Employee Information such as Social Security Numbers, addresses, and other information which is typically retained by an employer for every employee.  This article concerns information which is retained by an employee on his employer&#039;s conmputer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The title for this article is misleading.  This does not concern Personal Employee Information such as Social Security Numbers, addresses, and other information which is typically retained by an employer for every employee.  This article concerns information which is retained by an employee on his employer&#8217;s conmputer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlo Fioranelli</title>
		<link>http://www.discoveryresources.org/library/case-law-and-rules/no-privacy-for-employee-info-on-office-computers/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlo Fioranelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.discoveryresources.org/?p=471#comment-308</guid>
		<description>This article gives some great tips on how a company may outline employee relations so the company will be able to access the employees computer files in a litigation.  It is notable that the court in this case is deciding if the person&#039;s privacy rights have been violated after they are privy to the information.  It is easier to say that someone&#039;s rights have not been violated when they were stealing huge amounts of money.  If someone is innocent and they wrongfully search your private computer, what injury would they be allowed to claim in court; how would you calculate damages for the injury.  The best wisdom to tell someone at this point is do not co-mingle your personal and home information but try telling that to the people selling blackberries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article gives some great tips on how a company may outline employee relations so the company will be able to access the employees computer files in a litigation.  It is notable that the court in this case is deciding if the person&#8217;s privacy rights have been violated after they are privy to the information.  It is easier to say that someone&#8217;s rights have not been violated when they were stealing huge amounts of money.  If someone is innocent and they wrongfully search your private computer, what injury would they be allowed to claim in court; how would you calculate damages for the injury.  The best wisdom to tell someone at this point is do not co-mingle your personal and home information but try telling that to the people selling blackberries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

